An Analysis of Four Government-Funded Reviews of Research on Homeopathic Medicine

  • Ullman D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Homeopathic medicine is a controversial system of medicine that has been used worldwide for over 200 years. Recently, several governments, in part, owing to government-funded reviews of research on homeopathic medicine, have stopped reimbursements for homeopathic medicines and have discouraged their use by medical professionals. This review critically evaluates four government-funded reviews of clinical research on homeopathic medicine. An analysis of government-sponsored reviews of clinical research on homeopathic medicine was conducted, including two studies from Switzerland, one from England, and one from Australia. Three of the four government-funded reviews were critical of homeopathy, claiming that there was no reliable evidence that homeopathic medicines were effective. Three of these reviews had significant flaws, with potential ethical concerns raised in one of the reviews. The most comprehensive review of homeopathic research, including analysis of clinical and basic science concerns, found the most positive results for homeopathy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ullman, D. (2021). An Analysis of Four Government-Funded Reviews of Research on Homeopathic Medicine. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15899

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free