Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: A stronger role for justice

38Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reid, L. (2020). Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: A stronger role for justice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 46(8), 526–530. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free