Chapter 12: Decompressive Craniectomy: Long Term Outcome and Ethical Considerations

8Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been established to decrease mortality. Despite the conclusion of the two largest randomized clinical trials associating the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy vs. medical management for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is still clinical equipoise concerning the usefulness of DC in the management of refractory intracranial hypertension. Primary outcome data from these studies reveal either potential harm or that decreased mortality only leads to an upsurge in survivors with severe neurologic incapacity. In this chapter, we seek to review the results of the most recent clinical trials, highlight the prevailing controversies, and offer potential solutions to address this dilemma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kwan, K., Schneider, J., & Ullman, J. S. (2019, September 6). Chapter 12: Decompressive Craniectomy: Long Term Outcome and Ethical Considerations. Frontiers in Neurology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00876

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free