Prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing suture needle drainage and argon laser drainage of subretinal fluid

28Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims-This study was designed to compare suture needle drainage (SND) with argon laser drainage (ALD) of subretinal fluid. Methods-A prospective, randomised, controlled, clinical trial was carried out on 93 patients undergoing external drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. The incidence of successful drainage, incidence of subretinal haemorrhage, incidence of retinal incarceration, and incidence of retinal perforation were determined. Results-The success rate was 97.9% in the ALD group and 84-8% in the SND group (difference - 13.1%, 95% CI -26.4% to 2-0%). The incidence of clinically significant subretinal haemorrhage was 4-3% in the ALD group compared with 28.3% in the SND group (difference 24.0%, 95% CI 7.6% to 40.4%). The incidence of incarceration was comparable in each group. There were no cases of retinal perforation. Conclusions-The use of ALD was associated with a higher rate of successful SRF drainage, and a lower incidence of clinically significant subretinal haemorrhage than SND. ALD is preferred when an endolaser is available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aylward, G. W., Orr, G., Schwartz, S. D., & Leaver, P. K. (1995). Prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing suture needle drainage and argon laser drainage of subretinal fluid. British Journal of Ophthalmology. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.8.724

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free