Precarity in Global Anthropology: Reflexions on the margins of the Global Survey of Anthropological Practice

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this essay, we draw primarily on the 2018 Global Survey of Anthropological Practice in order to develop a series of considerations on the issue of precarity in Anthropology. Other reports and available literature are also taken into consideration in the proposed analysis. We start by introducing the issue of precarity in Anthropology as both a trending research topic and an empirical reality in the very practice of our discipline. Then, we analyse the WCAA Global Survey by focusing on its findings regarding employment and salary. In the third and fourth sections of the article, global differences in anthropological practice are taken into account from the perspective of a South-North divide. The fifth section is devoted to reflections on the epistemological dimensions of precarity, neoliberalism and anthropology. We conclude by highlighting ongoing actions and pointing to possible horizons. The main purpose of this essay is, by drawing on available data on anthropologist’s working conditions, to address specificities and challenges that discipline must face when it comes to precarity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferreira, V. K., & Stoica, G. (2022). Precarity in Global Anthropology: Reflexions on the margins of the Global Survey of Anthropological Practice. Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, 19. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43412022v19d707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free