Clinical and epidemiological significance of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii infections

56Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Carbapenems are considered the treatment of choice for Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Many facilities implement preventive measures toward only carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB). However, the independent role of the carbapenem resistance determinant on patient outcomes remains controversial. In a 6-year analysis of adults with A. baumannii bloodstream infection (BSI), the outcomes of 149 CRAB isolates were compared to those of 91 patients with carbapenem-susceptible A. baumannii. In bivariable analyses, CRAB BSIs were significantly associated with worse outcomes and with a delay in the initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy (DAAT). However, in multivariable analyses, carbapenem resistance status was no longer associated with poor outcomes, while DAAT remained an independent predictor. The epidemiological significance of A. baumannii should not be determined by its resistance to carbapenems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tal-Jasper, R., Katz, D. E., Amrami, N., Ravid, D., Avivi, D., Zaidenstein, R., … Marchaim, D. (2016). Clinical and epidemiological significance of carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 60(5), 3127–3131. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02656-15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free