Cesar Lattes and the Nobel Prize: The Logic of Scientific Prestige in the Twentieth Century

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Using sources from the Nobel Prize archive, this article seeks to understand why Cesar Lattes did not share the 1950 Nobel Prize with Cecil Powell for the discovery of the π meson. To do so, we contextualize and discuss the Prize based on secondary literature that helps us understand how the Swedish Academy of Sciences historically selects its laureates. Next, we discuss the nomination letters that Lattes, Powell and Giuseppe Occhialini received for their work on the development of the photographic emulsion technique and detecting the π meson, the evaluations that the Nobel physics committee made of this work and its justification for only awarding Powell. We conclude with a reflection on the dynamics of the distribution of prestige and recognition for scientific discoveries based on the episode.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

da Silva Neto, C. P., & Tavares, H. (2024). Cesar Lattes and the Nobel Prize: The Logic of Scientific Prestige in the Twentieth Century. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica, 46. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2024-0188

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free