Pharmacoeconomics of three therapeutic schemes for anti-tuberculosis therapy induced liver injury in China

16Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To evaluate the pharmacoeconomics of three therapeutic schemes in treating anti-tuberluosis therapy -induced liver injury (anti-TB DILI). Methods. In the construction of a decision tree model, the efficacy and safety parameters came from the results of the randomized, controlled trial conducted here, the effect parameters were derived from expert advice, and the cost parameters, such as usage specification, number, and unit price, came from literature, expert advice, and so on. Results. The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) based on the effect degrees showed that bicyclol had the best effect (4.63562). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (206.03270) of bicyclol was the lowest. The cost-effectiveness ratio of silibinin was the lowest (68.59987). The CEA based on the complete normalization rate showed that bicyclol had the highest complete normalization rate (83.562%), the lowest cost-effectiveness ratio (4.63627), and the smallest ICER (4.63504). Sensitivity analyses proved the robustness of the results. Conclusions. Bicyclol is the most cost-effective therapy and the preferred choice for treating anti-TB DILI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Y., Ye, P., Ren, C., Ren, P., Ma, Z., Zhang, L., … Jiang, C. (2018). Pharmacoeconomics of three therapeutic schemes for anti-tuberculosis therapy induced liver injury in China. Open Medicine (Poland), 13(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2018-0010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free