Principled Limitations on Self-Representation for Generic Physical Systems

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The ideas of self-observation and self-representation, and the concomitant idea of self-control, pervade both the cognitive and life sciences, arising in domains as diverse as immunology and robotics. Here, we ask in a very general way whether, and to what extent, these ideas make sense. Using a generic model of physical interactions, we prove a theorem and several corollaries that severely restrict applicable notions of self-observation, self-representation, and self-control. We show, in particular, that adding observational, representational, or control capabilities to a meta-level component of a system cannot, even in principle, lead to a complete meta-level representation of the system as a whole. We conclude that self-representation can at best be heuristic, and that self models cannot, in general, be empirically tested by the systems that implement them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fields, C., Glazebrook, J. F., & Levin, M. (2024). Principled Limitations on Self-Representation for Generic Physical Systems. Entropy, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/e26030194

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free