Comparison of health state utility estimates from instrument-based and vignette-based methods: A case study in kidney disease

7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: We take advantage of a rare occurrence when two different studies report on the estimation of quality of life utilities for the same health states to assess convergence of the reported measures. Health state utilities are important inputs into health economic models that estimate the impact of new medical technologies using a common metric of health gain - the quality adjusted life-year. Results: We find low concordance between the two measures which is concerning in that this could have important ramifications for health care decision making based on estimated cost-effectiveness. We explore possible reasons for the discrepancy between the two measures and draw implications for the design of future studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Briggs, A. H., Belozeroff, V., & Feeny, D. (2019). Comparison of health state utility estimates from instrument-based and vignette-based methods: A case study in kidney disease. BMC Research Notes, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4413-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free