Lovemarks and beyond: Examining the link between lovemarks and brand loyalty through customer advocacy in the automobile industry

11Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose Despite the potential for businesses, our understanding of lovemark brands and their consequences is limited. Numerous psychological and brand-related consequences are linked to lovemarks, but the role of influential underlining mechanisms is not fully understood. Inspired by the norms of reciprocity theory, the current study investigates the underlining role of customer advocacy in the relationship between perceived lovemarks and brand loyalty of customers in the automobile industry. Methodology By adopting the survey method, a sample of 478 was drawn from Pakistani automobile customers. Structural equation modelling was used for the analysis. We conceptualised lovemarks and brand loyalty as reflective higher-order constructs that we analysed through a two-stage disjoint analysis. Findings Our results support the conceptualization of lovemarks and brand loyalty as higher-order constructs. The influence of lovemarks and customer advocacy on brand loyalty was statistically significant when we controlled for age, gender, and income. Our findings also reveal that customer advocacy, seen as a company’s positive interactions, mediates and play a key role in influencing the relationship between lovemarks and brand loyalty. Originality This is among the first studies to examine the role of customer advocacy in the lovemarks-brand loyalty relationship. We examined these relationships in the automobile sector of Pakistan, which offers several theoretical and managerial implications for academia and practitioners. The implications are proposed and outlined in this study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Javed, N., Khalil, S. H., Ishaque, A., & Khalil, S. M. (2023). Lovemarks and beyond: Examining the link between lovemarks and brand loyalty through customer advocacy in the automobile industry. PLoS ONE, 18(4 April). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285193

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free