Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Alternating posture between sitting and standing with sit-stand desks may improve lower back pain (LBP). This study explored the effectiveness, acceptability and adherence of two sit-stand desk recommendations on LBP (measured via App) and secondary health and work outcomes. Fifty-six desk-based workers with LBP (age = 37.7 [SD = 10.0] years, 75 % women) were randomised to either a fixed ratio (30 min sitting:15 min standing); or a personalised ratio (self-selected or pre-emptive to discomfort). After 3 months, fixed ratio participants experienced reduced worst (−1.33 points/10) and average LBP (−0.83 points/10); personalised ratio participants experienced reduced worst LBP only (−0.69 points/10). Fixed ratio participants improved in their job-related stress, concentration and presenteeism; whereas, personalised ratio participants reduced their sitting time. Both recommendations were acceptable, while adherence was higher in the fixed ratio group. In conclusion, a 30:15 sit-stand ratio was acceptable and effective at improving LBP in the short term compared to a personalised ratio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brakenridge, C. L., Johnston, V., Andrews, N. E., Gomersall, S. R., Russell, T., & Smith, M. D. (2026). Do fixed or personalised sit-stand desk ratios improve lower back pain? A randomised trial. Applied Ergonomics, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104670

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free