Postoperative spirometry after laparoscopy for lower abdominal or upper abdominal surgical procedures

52Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this prospective study, we have compared women undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic gynaecological surgery and laparoscopic minor gynaecological procedures (diagnostic, tubal ligation) (n = 10 in each group) to determine if lower abdominal laparoscopy results in less postoperative pulmonary dysfunction than upper abdominal laparoscopy. Pulmonary testing was performed before operation, and 3 and 6 h after operation, on the first and second days after surgery. After operation, a significant reduction in forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and peak expiratory flow rate occurred after laparoscopic cholecystectomy at each time. There were no significant changes after minor gynaecologic laparoscopy, whereas laparoscopic gynaecological surgery resulted in minor pulmonary dysfunction on the day of surgery only. We conclude that postoperative pulmonary function was less impaired after gynaecological laparoscopy than after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study suggests that the site of surgery is an important determinant of lung dysfunction after laparoscopy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joris, J., Kaba, A., & Lamy, M. (1997). Postoperative spirometry after laparoscopy for lower abdominal or upper abdominal surgical procedures. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79(4), 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/79.4.422

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free