Prescription Opioid Resiliency and Vulnerability: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Case Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite declines in prescription opioid overdoses, rural areas continue to have higher prescription opioid overdose rates than urban areas. We aim to understand high overdose places were resilient to the prescription opioid overdose crisis (better than predicted), while others were vulnerable (worse than predicted). First, we predicted prescription opioid overdose mortality in 2016–18 for N = 2,013 non-metropolitan counties using multivariable regression accounting. Second, we constructed a resiliency-vulnerability typology using observed, predicted, and residual values from the regression. Third, we selected a high-overdose resilient and vulnerable community for case study analysis using interviews, focus groups, and observations. High-overdose resilient and vulnerable places had disability-dispensing-overdose pathways, legacies of mining, and polysubstance drug abuse. Resilient places were larger population micropolitans with extensive health and social services, norms of redemption and acceptance of addiction, and community-wide mobilization of public and non-profit resources. Vulnerable places were smaller, more remote, lacked services, and stigmatized addiction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hochstetler, A., Peters, D. J., & Monnat, S. M. (2022). Prescription Opioid Resiliency and Vulnerability: A Mixed-Methods Comparative Case Study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(4), 651–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-022-09701-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free