Validity and Reliability of an Arabic Version of MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI)

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Dysphagia is a common adverse event among head and neck (H&N) cancer patients. We aimed, for the first time, to validate the Arabic version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) among 82 Saudi Arabian patients with H&N cancer. We followed established validation guidelines and translated the 20-item MDADI using the forward–backward method. Our results revealed 100% feasibility. Test–retest reliability demonstrated acceptable interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for the subscale domains (emotional = 0.973, physical = 0.971, and functional = 0.956) and composite score (ICC = 0.984). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the emotional, functional, and physical subscales were 0.937, 0.825, and 0.945, respectively (composite score = 0.975). We confirmed concurrent validity by demonstrating significant correlations between the domains of the Arabic MDADI and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life Head and Neck Module (QLQ-H&N35). Our study validated the Arabic version of the MDADI among H&N cancer patients from Saudi Arabia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alsubaie, H. M., Sayed, S. I., Alsini, A. Y., Alkaff, H. H., Margalani, O. A., Abu-Zaid, A., … Abdelmonim, S. K. (2022). Validity and Reliability of an Arabic Version of MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Dysphagia, 37(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10356-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free