The Ethical Aspects of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring: Who Should Be Performing It?

  • Nel J
  • Labuschagne J
  • Wareham C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

South African legal and ethical guidelines direct health-care professionals to perform their duties in a manner that is acceptable within society. In South Africa, there is no minimum defined training or accreditation required to perform intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) nor is registration with the Health Professionals Council of South Africa (HPCSA) a prerequisite. It is therefore important to explore the ethical and legal aspects of this practice, particularly, since patients undergoing IONM are often vulnerable and need extra protection. We argue that the development of national guidelines sanctioned by a society or association with oversight from the HPCSA should be developed. In addition, independent providers of IONM should be governed as “health-care professionals” accountable to the HPCSA. This would ensure that the practice of IONM is better aligned with the ethical principles accepted by society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nel, J. D., Labuschagne, J. J., Wareham, C., Lee, C., & Chirwa, P. (2021). The Ethical Aspects of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring: Who Should Be Performing It? Wits Journal of Clinical Medicine, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.18772/26180197.2021.v3n2a7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free