Clustering and migration of important visual artists: Broad historical evidence

36Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

An article by John O'Hagan and Elish Kelly in 2005 (see Historical Methods 38:118-25) discussed collecting information on visual artists that would allow a broad historical ranking based on "prominence." O'Hagan and Kelly collected these data to examine prominent artists' birth locations, work locations, and their consequential patterns of labor movement during several long periods. In this article, the authors examine artists' migration for four periods (based on their date of birth): Renaissance Italy, Europe in the first half of the nineteenth century, and the Western world in general for the periods 1850-99 and 1900-49. The data show that important artists clustered in all periods at a remarkably high level. Florence and Rome dominated in Renaissance Italy, with significant clustering because of the artists' birthplaces and domestic migration. Paris and London witnessed a marked clustering of artists born in the first half of the nineteenth century, with Paris continuing to dominate among artists born in the second half of the nineteenth century. Artists born in the first half of the twentieth century clustered in New York City, with all prominent American artists clustering there. Copyright © 2008 Heldref Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Hagan, J., & Hellmanzik, C. (2008). Clustering and migration of important visual artists: Broad historical evidence. Historical Methods, 41(3), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.3200/HMTS.41.3.121-136

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free