Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments from polluted rivers

30Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Over the past few decades, in response to growing concerns about the impact of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on human health, a variety of environmental forensics and geochemical techniques have emerged for studying organic pollutants. These techniques include chemical fingerprinting, receptor modeling, and compound-specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA). Chemical fingerprinting methodology involves the use of diagnostic ratios. Receptor modeling techniques include the chemical mass balance (CMB) model and multivariate statistics. Multivariate techniques include factor analysis with multiple linear regression (FA/MLR), positive matrix factorization (PMF), and UNMIX. This article reviews applications of chemical fingerprinting, receptor modeling, and CSIA; comments on their uses; and contrasts the strengths and weaknesses of each methodology. © 2013 IUPAC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moyo, S., McCrindle, R., Mokgalaka, N., Myburgh, J., & Mujuru, M. (2013). Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments from polluted rivers. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 85(12), 2175–2196. https://doi.org/10.1351/PAC-CON-12-10-08

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free