Comparative genetic and chemical profiling performed on Alstonia scholaris in China and its implications to standardization of Traditional Chinese Medicine

  • Zhaoyang Z
  • Xiaodong L
  • Sheng L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Validity of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is oppugned very often because of the bugs of quality, effectiveness, and repeatability. Standardization of TCMs is one way to make a change. How to realize standardization of TCMs and with what measures to shape the quality control system, is provoking much debate in the TCM field. Genetic and chem. profiling were comparatively performed on Alstonia scholaris in China through amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) anal. and alkaloid high performance liq. chromatog. (HPLC) scanning, aiming to evaluate the attributes of chem. and DNA fingerprinting as applicable tools for quality control of TCMs and explore theoretic strategy of TCM standardization. Each individual of A. schlolaris displayed a unique AFLP or HPLC profile, indicating well individual-distinguishing ability of the two techniques. Patterns of variance structure disclosed by the HPLC and AFLP profiling were similar, and more than 50% of alkaloid loci were kept const. across any single population, suggesting a genetic basis of the alkaloid secondary metab. in the plant and justifying DNA fingerprinting as a qualified identifier for quality control of the TCM. Compared to the alkaloid HPLC scanning, the AFLP anal. produced much more loci with lower polymorphic loci percentage, suggesting that AFLP can be more statistically informative and with moderate sensitivity. In passing, a strategy pursuing genetically identical TCMs by popularizing plantation of selected germplasm of medicinal plants was suggested for TCM standardization. [on SciFinder(R)]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhaoyang, Z., Xiaodong, L., & Sheng, L. (2014). Comparative genetic and chemical profiling performed on Alstonia scholaris in China and its implications to standardization of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 8(6), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.5897/jmpr11.1015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free