Comparison of the simplate(TM) total plate count method with petrifilm(TM), redigel(TM), and conventional pour-plate methods for enumerating aerobic microorganisms in foods

54Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The SimPlate(TM) Total Hate Count (TPC) method, developed by IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., is designed to determine the most probable number of aerobic microorganisms in foods. The 24-h test was compared to the conventional plate count agar (PCA) method, the Petrifilm(TM) Aerobic Count plates, and the Redigel(TM) Total Count procedure for enumerating microflora in 751 food samples. Results using the SimPlate(TM) TPC method were highly correlated (r ≤ 0.96) with results from other test methods. Slopes (0.96-0.97) were not significantly different from 1, and y intercepts (-0.03-0.08) were not different from 0. The SimPlate(TM) has a high counting range (> 1600 most probable number per single dilution), thus requiring fewer dilutions of samples compared to other methods evaluated. Some foods, e.g., raw liver, wheat flour, and nuts, contain enzymes that gave false-positive reactions on SimPlates(TM). Overall, however, the SimPlate(TM) TPC method is a suitable alternative to conventional PCA, Petrifilm(TM), and Redigel(TM) methods for estimating populations of mesophilic aerobic microorganisms in a wide range of foods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beuchat, L. R., Copeland, F., Curiale, M. S., Danisavich, T., Gangar, V., King, B. W., … Townsend, D. E. (1998). Comparison of the simplate(TM) total plate count method with petrifilm(TM), redigel(TM), and conventional pour-plate methods for enumerating aerobic microorganisms in foods. Journal of Food Protection, 61(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-61.1.14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free