Cadence Tracking and Disturbance Rejection in Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling for Paraplegic Subjects: A Case Study

Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation cycling has been proposed as an assistive technology with numerous health and fitness benefits for people with spinal cord injury, such as improvement in cardiovascular function, increase in muscular mass, and reduction of bone mass loss. However, some limitations, for example, lack of optimal control strategies that would delay fatigue, may still prevent this technology from achieving its full potential. In this work, we performed experiments on a person with complete spinal cord injury using a stationary tadpole trike when both cadence tracking and disturbance rejection were evaluated. In addition, two sets of experiments were conducted 6 months apart and considering activation of different muscles. The results showed that reference tracking is achieved above the cadence of 25 rpm with mean absolute errors between 1.9 and 10% when only quadriceps are activated. The disturbance test revealed that interferences may drop the cadence but do not interrupt a continuous movement if the cadence does not drop below 25 rpm, again when only quadriceps are activated. When other muscle groups were added, strong spasticity caused larger errors on reference tracking, but not when a disturbance was applied. In addition, spasticity caused the last experiments to result in less smooth cycling.