The adaptation of epoxy resin and calcium silicate-based sealers in the middle third of the root canal wall: In vitro study

2Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: An ideal sealer produces a hermetic closure, does not cause tooth discoloration, is bacteriostatic, insoluble in tissue fluids and biocompatible, and has good adhesion and a long setting time. Until now, no sealer material has met all these criteria. This study analyzed the differences in sealer adaptation between epoxy resin calcium silicate-based sealers in the middle third of the root canal wall. Materials and Methods: Thirty-Two mandibular premolar teeth were prepared and divided into two groups (n = 16 each) according to the type of sealer used for obturation, Group 1 teeth were obturated with an epoxy resin-based sealer, and Group 2 teeth were obturated with a calcium silicate-based sealer. The teeth were cut vertically and prepared for scanning electron microscopy analysis. Sealer adaptation was scored and then analyzed statistically by a Chi-square test. Results: The adaptation scores were poor for 0 (0%) teeth, good for 13 (81.25%), and very good for 3 (18.75%) for the epoxy resin-based sealer and poor for 3 (18.75%) teeth, good for 5 (31.25%), and very good for 8 (50%) for the calcium silicate-based sealer. No statistically significant difference was detected between the adaptation of epoxy resin-based and calcium silicate-based sealers (P > 0.05). Overall, the particles appeared larger for epoxy resin than for calcium silicate. Discussion and Conclusion: No statistical difference was detected for sealer adaptation between epoxy resin-based and calcium silicate-based sealers in the middle third of the root canal wall.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maharti, I., Ahimsa, R., & Putranto, A. (2023). The adaptation of epoxy resin and calcium silicate-based sealers in the middle third of the root canal wall: In vitro study. Saudi Endodontic Journal, 13(3), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_15_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free