The F-measure for Research Priority

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: In this contribution we continue our investigations related to the activity index (AI) and its formal analogs. We try to replace the AI by an indicator which is better suited for policy applications. Design/methodology/approach: We point out that fluctuations in the value of the AI for a given country and domain are never the result of that country's policy with respect to that domain alone because there are exogenous factors at play. For this reason we introduce the F-measure. This F-measure is nothing but the harmonic mean of the country's share in the world's publication output in the given domain and the given domain's share in the country's publication output. Findings: The F-measure does not suffer from the problems the AI does. Research limitations: The indicator is not yet fully tested in real cases. R&D policy management: In policy considerations, the AI should better be replaced by the F-measure as this measure can better show the results of science policy measures (which the AI cannot as it depends on exogenous factors). Originality/value: We provide an original solution for a problem that is not fully realized by policy makers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rousseau, R. (2018). The F-measure for Research Priority. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free