Experimental Evaluation of Supervisory Switching Control for Unmanned Surface Vehicles

26Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, a method of incorporating multiobjective controller selection into a closed-loop control system is presented and validated using a full-sized unmanned surface vehicle. Three controllers are utilized to capture three 'behaviors' representative of typical maneuvers that would be performed in a port environment: 1) a nonlinear controller for transiting between locations using an underactuated thruster configuration; 2) a nonlinear controller for station-keeping at a setpoint heading and position using a fully actuated thruster configuration; and 3) a nonlinear controller for reversing using an underactuated thruster configuration. Given a trajectory to follow, a performance-based supervisory switching control system (PBSSC) dictates the switching between controllers to improve the closed-loop performance. Stability between controller switches is guaranteed through average dwell-time switching, and a novel method for determining minimum dwell-time between subsystems with transformed states is utilized. The proposed system was tested in field experiments on a physical platform against a nonlinear, gain-scheduled 'baseline' controller capable of adequately performing all three behaviors using a fully actuated thruster configuration. Using integral of absolute error (IAE) metrics, results demonstrate that positioning of the PBSSC system is 20% better than that of the fully actuated baseline controller. However, the orientation IAE of the baseline controller was 50% better than the other controllers, because the system uses a fully actuated thruster configuration along the entire experimental trajectory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bertaska, I. R., & Von Ellenrieder, K. D. (2019). Experimental Evaluation of Supervisory Switching Control for Unmanned Surface Vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 44(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2018.2802019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free