Efficacy, outcomes, and complication rates of different surgical and nonsurgical treatment modalities for recurrent/residual oropharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

67Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Treatment of recurrent oropharyngeal cancer is widely thought to have poor outcomes. Justification for treatment, especially in advanced cases, can be difficult. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted. Included studies reported specific recurrent oropharyngeal cancer survival data. Results: Twenty-two retrospective studies were included. Pooled 3-year overall survival (OS) was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 22% to 29%; I squared = 40.7%; p =.057). Pooled 5-year OS was 23% (95% CI = 20% to 27%; I squared = 73.9%; p =.000). Surgical treatment was superior to radiation (5-year OS 26% vs 16%, respectively; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jayaram, S. C., Muzaffar, S. J., Ahmed, I., Dhanda, J., Paleri, V., & Mehanna, H. (2016, December 1). Efficacy, outcomes, and complication rates of different surgical and nonsurgical treatment modalities for recurrent/residual oropharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Head and Neck. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24531

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free