A Comparative Study of Pyridine-Boron Trifluoride, Pyrazine-(BF 3 ) 2 and Triazine-(BF 3 ) 3 as Electrolyte Additives for Lithium-Ion Cells

  • Nie M
  • Xia J
  • Ma L
  • et al.
24Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The novel electrolyte additives pyridine boron trifluoride, pyrazine di-boron trifluoride and triazine tri-boron trifluoride were compared in Li[Ni 1/3 Mn 1/3 Co 1/3 ]O 2 /graphite and Li[Ni 0.42 Mn 0.42 Co 0.16 ]O 2 /graphite pouch cells. This series of additives allowed the Lewis base:BF 3 ratio to be systematically varied. The results were compared to baseline experiments on cells with well-known additives such as vinylene carbonate (VC) or prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone (PES). Increasing the BF 3 content on the additive can reduce the impedance of cells during charge-discharge cycling. However the coulombic efficiency, charge endpoint capacity slippage and long-term cycling behavior of these pouch cells was not improved by increasing the content of BF 3 in the additives. Li-ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in applications from portable consumer electronics to electric vehicles (EVs). 1,2 Incorpo-rating electrolyte additives into the electrolyte is the most effective method for extending lifetime of LIBs. In a previous study, pyri-dine boron trifluoride (PBF) showed clear benefits as an additive for NMC-based lithium ion cells. 3 The two major functional groups pyridine (organic base) and BF 3 were combined together to try to solve issues in lithium-ion cells, including: 1) transition metal dis-solution from the positive electrode material at high potential; 4 2) electrolyte (salts and solvents) decomposition at high potential and elevated temperature; 5 and 3) impedance growth during high potential and long-term cycling. 6 However, the mechanism by which PBF-type additives function is not understood. When PBF-type additives are used there is a 1:1 addition of the pyridine derivative and BF 3 . This may not be the optimum ratio. Zuo et al. 7 reported that LiBF 4 added as an additive could reduce impedance during high potential cycling and that the beneficial ef-fects of LiBF 4 arise from the single BF 4 − ion. It is important to know which functional group, pyridine or BF 3 , has a greater impact in PBF-type additives and which functional group is more beneficial to Li-ion cell lifetime. By using the same simple synthesis method, 8 one, two or three BF 3 molecules can easily be added to pyridine, pyrazine or tri-azine, respectively, to learn about the impact of this series of additives with increased BF 3 content. In this work, additives with different amounts of BF 3 were suc-cessfully synthesized with 1:1 to 1:3 mole ratio of Lewis base:BF 3 . These additives were used to study the benefits of BF 3 as a functional group and to optimize the BF 3 content in these additives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nie, M., Xia, J., Ma, L., & Dahn, J. R. (2015). A Comparative Study of Pyridine-Boron Trifluoride, Pyrazine-(BF 3 ) 2 and Triazine-(BF 3 ) 3 as Electrolyte Additives for Lithium-Ion Cells. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 162(10), A2066–A2074. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0411510jes

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free