Abstract
Discrepancy processes may be helpful in noticing prospective memory targets (McDaniel, Guynn, Einstein, & Breneiser, 2004). We manipulated the discrepancy of prospective memory targets from the processing coherence established by the ongoing task by preexposing nontarget items in the ongoing task either five times (high discrepancy) or two times (low discrepancy). Prospective memory performance was significantly better in the high-discrepancy group than in the low-discrepancy group. These results support a discrepancy view of prospective remembering. Copyright 2006 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Breneiser, J. E., & McDaniel, M. A. (2006). Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.