Global mimicry: Putting strategic choice back on the business school agenda

70Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Business schools are subject to strong institutional pressures. In this paper we examine university-based business schools in the UK. We argue that the result of such pressures has been to render business schools isomorphic in a number of ways and to diminish the potential voice of business school research in social and economic issues. We detail the range of institutional pressures and then suggest that schools have choices in the ways they might adapt their strategies to counter normative, coercive and mimetic pressures. Drawing on Oliver's notion of strategic behaviours, we suggest that business schools should adopt a wider scholarly lens and turn its theoretical perspectives and empirical research toward 'big' social and economic questions. The difficulties, advantages and implications of changing strategic behaviours are discussed. © 2011 The Author. British Journal of Management © 2011 British Academy of Management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, D., & McKiernan, P. (2011). Global mimicry: Putting strategic choice back on the business school agenda. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00765.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free