Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers of Blood Donation among Students of Soran Technical College: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Safe and effective blood transfusion is a vital component in improving health and preventing the spread of blood-borne diseases worldwide. The current study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward blood donation among Soran Technical College students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 25th February 2022 to 7th May 2022. A non-probability convenience sampling method included 200 students; it was divided into medical and non-medical students. A self-administered questionnaire with closed-ended questions was used to collect information concerning socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding blood donation. Results: More than half of the study samples (59.5%) were within the age group of less than 20 years. The majority (68%) were female. And nearly half of the students came from an urban area. The majority of respondents (90.5%) had a fair level of knowledge, while 7% had good knowledge of blood donation. However, 59% of the students had a positive attitude toward blood donation. The most common motivators that encouraged blood donors were 72.5% getting subsidies and vacations, and 71% getting free laboratory examinations. Common barriers for blood donors were worried about sanitation and getting infectious diseases, and the side effects (58.7%) and (54.5%), respectively. Conclusion: Despite most of the students having a favorable attitude toward blood donation but unexpectedly having a fair level of knowledge, the major barrier perceived by students was fear of acquiring an infectious disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmed, S., Tahir, A., & Seniar, M. (2023). Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers of Blood Donation among Students of Soran Technical College: A Cross-Sectional Study. Erbil Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 6(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.15218/ejnm.2023.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free