Do pathogen-specific defense mechanisms contribute to wound-induced resistance in tomato?

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A network of shared intermediates/components and/or common molecular outputs in biotic and abiotic stress signaling has long been known, but the possibility of effective influence between differendy triggered stresses (co-protecdon) is less studied. Recent observations show that wounding induces transient protection in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to four pathogens with a range of lifestyles, locally and systemically. The contribution of ethylene (ET) in basal but also in wound-induced resistance to each pathogen, although dispensable, is demonstrated to be positive (Botrytis cinerea, Phytophthora capsici) or negative (Fusarium oxysporum, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato). Furthermore, the expression of several defense markers is influenced locally and/or systemically by wounding and ET, and might be part of that core of conserved molecular responses whereby an abiotic stress such as wounding imparts co-resistance to biotic stress. In this addendum, we speculate on some of the physiological responses to wounding that might contribute to the modulation of resistance in a more pathogen-specific manner. ©2008 Landes Bioscience.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Francia, D., Demaria, D., Calderini, O., Ferraris, L., Valentino, D., Arcioni, S., … Cardinale, F. (2008). Do pathogen-specific defense mechanisms contribute to wound-induced resistance in tomato? Plant Signaling and Behavior, 3(5), 340–341. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.3.5.5351

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free