Discrepancy between prescribed and real work: the case of outsourced service contract supervisors at federal universities in the state of São Paulo

  • Bedin É
  • Fontes A
  • Braatz D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The article aims to identify the specificities and complexity of the work of public servants who act as contract supervisors, by evaluating their prescribed work and actual work. Design/methodology/approach: For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 public servants with additional service contract supervisory roles at three federal universities in the state of São Paulo. Findings: The results reveal the practice of designating contract supervisory roles when civil servants enter into public service, even though they have no previous experience or specific training, which causes great difficulties on a day-to-day basis. Originality/value: Public and private organizations should reflect on the way they organize work, which is affected by the rigidity of institutional norms, causing experiences of suffering, fear, and occupational diseases. There should be a focus on people management policies and the human and behavioral development of workers. These actions are important for the development of skills that enable greater integration of the different areas of knowledge, in order to achieve results for the organization, without wearing down teams.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bedin, É., Fontes, A., & Braatz, D. (2020). Discrepancy between prescribed and real work: the case of outsourced service contract supervisors at federal universities in the state of São Paulo. Review of Business Management, 22(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i2.4055

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free