The Multinational Approach to Peace and Stability in Afghanistan: Divergence and Convergence between Pakistan, United States and China

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Afghanistan provides a significant geographical linkage for the regions of the Middle East, South Asia, and Western Asia; therefore, its stability is utmost important for regional as well as broader global accord. The two and half decades of the US military engagement inside Afghanistan had a qualified success as far as peace and stability goals were concerned. The Doha talks focused on the complete withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan and the internal dialogues among the Afghan stakeholders. Here, the United States, China and Pakistan’s stakes inside Afghanistan became very significant in the context of counter-terrorism and peace. However, the policies of these three significant powers diverge over major elements of security and peace in the region. This paper attempts to explore such divergence and convergence in the multinational peace building approach in Afghanistan. A mixed methodology approach is used to investigate such divergence and convergence in the multinational approach to Afghanistan in the region. The findings of the paper suggest that the two major powers, the US and China are strategically involved in countering each other’s influence and retaining their dominance in Central Asian region, including Afghanistan. For Pakistan on the other hand, the major adversary to contain and confine in the region is India. The paper argues that the three nations can benefit on a common ground if a multilateral approach to peace building is carried out prudently for the sake of a long-term peace and stability in the region.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parveen, S., Aman, S., & Aman, S. (2023). The Multinational Approach to Peace and Stability in Afghanistan: Divergence and Convergence between Pakistan, United States and China. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 17(4), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.51709/19951272/Winter2023/9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free