Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Generative Large Language Models

8Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The examination of gender bias, alongside other demographic biases like race, nationality, and religion, within generative large language models (LLMs), is increasingly capturing the attention of both the scientific community and industry stakeholders. These biases often affect generative LLMs, influencing popular products and potentially compromising user experiences. A growing body of research is dedicated to enhancing gender representations in natural language processing (NLP) across a spectrum of generative LLMs. This paper explores the current research focused on identifying and evaluating gender bias in generative LLMs. A comprehensive investigation is conducted to evaluate and mitigate gender bias across five distinct generative LLMs. The mitigation strategies implemented yield significant improvements in gender bias scores, with performance enhancements of up to 46% compared to zero-shot text generation approaches. Additionally, we explore how different levels of LLM precision and quantization impact gender bias, providing insights into how technical factors influence bias mitigation strategies. By tackling these challenges and suggesting areas for future research, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discussion about gender bias in language technologies, promoting more equitable and inclusive NLP systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, H., Inkpen, D., & Kantarci, B. (2024). Evaluating and Mitigating Gender Bias in Generative Large Language Models. International Journal of Computers, Communications and Control, 19(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2024.6.6853

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free