Comparison of Conventional Machine Learning and Convolutional Deep Learning Models for Seagrass Mapping Using Satellite Imagery

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Benthic communities, such as seagrass meadows, play a crucial environmental role in marine ecosystems and provide socio-economic benefits. Satellite remote sensing is currently used for its monitoring, and deep learning (DL) techniques offer improvements in mapping quality compared to traditional machine learning (ML). This study compares conventional ML and convolutional DL models for mapping Cymodocea nodosa meadows in El Río, Canary Islands, using WorldView-2 satellite imagery. An in-situ measurement campaign was conducted to generate an open dataset for segmentation. Evaluated models include decision trees, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbors, Subspace KNN, feedforward neural networks, U-Net, Attention U-Net, and Pix2Pix models. Results show that DL models significantly outperform conventional ML models in detecting Cymodocea nodosa. The best model (U-net) achieved an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 83% overall and 74% for Cymodocea nodosa, while the best ML model (FNN) only reached 62% and 23%, respectively. IoU was highlighted for its sensitivity to minor mapping changes. In addition, a temporal analysis revealed a dramatic 96% reduction in Cymodocea nodosa coverage over 21 years, from 245.32 ha in 2001 to 9.31 ha in 2022. This study not only compares conventional ML and convolutional DL techniques for benthic habitat mapping but also provides a valuable methodology and dataset for future marine ecosystem monitoring research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mederos-Barrera, A., Albors, L., Marques, F., Marcello, J., Martinez, G., & Eugenio, F. (2026). Comparison of Conventional Machine Learning and Convolutional Deep Learning Models for Seagrass Mapping Using Satellite Imagery. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 19, 3888–3907. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2025.3642923

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free