Invalid and Defective Contracts in Islamic Legal Theory: The Rise of a Transnational Islamic Law

  • Bantekas I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are three types of contracts under Islamic law: sahih,Jp-sid and batil. Contracts whose essence and attributes are lawful and which have no defects in their elements (asl) or characteristics (was]) are termed sahih (valid). It should be stated that in respect ofpsid contracts only the wasfmay be defective, whereas in respect of batil contracts the asl of the contract may also be defective. Fasid is a type of contract permitted by its intrinsic characteristics but not its features. Its irregularity negates its validity, which if cured would make this type of contract valid. The concept of baftil relates to a contract whose elements and characteristics are devoid of legality. This difference betweenfsid and batil results in a difference of effects. Each of these contracts are divided into different types. Sometimes, the conditions incorporated in a contract also determine the nature of the contract as either valid, irregular, or void. This article discusses these contracts , as well as the requirements pertaining thereto, as well as the types of terms which are included in a contract and their effect on the validity of the contract.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bantekas, I. (2024). Invalid and Defective Contracts in Islamic Legal Theory: The Rise of a Transnational Islamic Law. UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/n421164410

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free