Abstract
Background: Tubal ligation is used in a large number of young patients, who frequently want a new pregnancy, the percentage rate ranges from 1.3 to 15%. Until now the standard treatment has been the microsurgical tubal anastomosis through laparotomy, however, the development of new techniques and instruments allowed a laparoscopic approach for this surgery. Objectives: to make a synthesis of the hystory and operatory technics in laparoscopic tubal anastomosis to evaluate the inclusions criteria, the preoperative work-up, the factors of prognosis and to make a comparison between laparotomy and laparoscopy. Methods: We make a search in medline database (PubMed), with the key words: tubal anastomosis, reversal of sterilization, infertility, microsurgery, tubal sterilization, and selecting all of the review publications in microsurgical tubal reanastomosis by laparotomy and all of publications of the laparoscopic technic. Results: The microsurgical tubal anastomosis through laparotomy has a pregnancy rate ranging from 70% to 80%. The first publications whith the laparoscopic technic show dissapointed results, however, papers with bigger casuistics and with the microlaparoscopic technic show the same results that the open technic with all of the advantages of the laparoscopy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic tubal reversal is a feasible, tested and successful alternative to the traditional surgery performed by laparotomy, however, to achieve a successful outcome it is necessary a meticulous surgical technique, adequate equipment and extensive experience with tubal anastomosis by laparotomy and advances laparoscopic techniques.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Escalona M., J. R., Rabischong, B., Nohuz, E., & Moraga P., A. M. (2006). Reanastomosis tubárica por vía laparoscópica. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, 71(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-75262006000200006
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.