Surgery and subsequent risk of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence: A meta-analysis of observational studies

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Surgery is the main treatment for stage I, II, and IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the relationship between surgery and NSCLC recurrence is unclear. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to determine whether surgery is associated with an increased risk of NSCLC recurrence. Methods: We used the electronic databases in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE to carry out a systematic literature search before December 1st, 2017. All studies on the association between surgery and subsequent risk of NSCLC recurrence were included and then analyzed using RevMan 5.3. Results: Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis involving 3,190 patients. The relationship between surgery and NSCLC recurrence was evaluated by pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The results suggested that surgery does not increase the risk of NSCLC recurrence (OR =0.42, 95% CI, 0.25-0.72, P=0.001). Conclusions: Our results showed that surgery decreased the risk of NSCLC recurrence in stage I−IV.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, J., Miao, H., Li, R., & Wen, Z. (2020). Surgery and subsequent risk of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Translational Cancer Research, 9(3), 1960–1968. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2020.02.15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free