Physiological factors influencing diabetes control in type 1 diabetes children with insulin pumps from diagnosis

7Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to identify the physiological factors influencing diabetes control in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) from diabetes diagnosis. Methods: This study focused on 163 children (81 boys) initiated with CSII within 2 weeks after T1D recognition and treated for at least 3 years. We analysed fasting C-peptide, GADA, ICA, IA2A, BMI z-score, total daily dose, and basal insulin. Patients were divided into groups according to their metabolic control: 7.5% > HbA1c ≥ 7.5% at the end of the study. Results: At the end of the follow-up, patients with HbA1c <7.5%, had a lower HbA1c level at diagnosis (11.7% vs 12.6%; P = 0.018), lower HbA1c level at both the first-year (6.7% vs 7.3%; P = 0.000) and the second-year (6.8% vs.7.7%; P = 0.000) follow-up, and a lower GADA level (P = 0.001). A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that HbA1c at diagnosis (P = 0.012), HbA1c at first year (P = 0.000), HbA1c at second year (P = 0.000), age at diagnosis (P = 0.047), GADA (P = 0.031), and basal insulin at third year (P = 0.032), influenced HbA1c <7.5% at the third year of follow-up. At the end of the study, 76% of patients started with CSII at the age <10 years and 49% of subjects initiated with CSII at the age ≥10 years achieved HbA1c ≤7.5%. Conclusions: This study shows that for those who initiated CSII at T1D onset, younger age, less intense autoimmune process, a low HbA1c at recognition, and good diabetes control during the first year of treatment were associated with long-term optimal glycaemic control.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piechowiak, K., & Szypowska, A. (2019). Physiological factors influencing diabetes control in type 1 diabetes children with insulin pumps from diagnosis. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free