Correction to: Design and Synthesis of FeOOH/CeO 2 Heterolayered Nanotube Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction (Advanced Materials, (2016), 28, 23, (4698-4703), 10.1002/adma.201600054)

Abstract

Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4698–4703 It has come to the authors' attention that the Figure and Figure S7, S8, and S15 in the Supporting Information of the published article were incorrect. The corrected versions are presented below. 2b (Figure presented.) XPS spectra of FeOOH/CeO2 HLNTs-NF, FeOOH NTAs-NF and CeO2 NTAs-NF in the Fe 2p region. S7 (Figure presented.) XRD patterns of FeOOH/CeO2 HLNTs-NF, CeO2 NTAs-NF, and NF electrocatalyst. S8 (Figure presented.) XPS spectra of FeOOH/CeO2 HLNTs-NF, FeOOH NTAs-NF, and CeO2 NTAs-NF in the O 1s region. S15 (Figure presented.) XRD pattern of FeOOH/CeO2 HLNTs-NF before and after 50 h constant OER at overpotential of 400 mV. Furthermore, the following text in the article is corrected: On page 4699, “CeO2 (222), CeO2 (044), and CeO2 (543)” should be revised as “CeO2 (200), CeO2 (222), CeO2 (044), and CeO2 (543)”; and “FeOOH (110), FeOOH (200), FeOOH (310), FeOOH (411), FeOOH (211), and FeOOH (400)” should be revised as “FeOOH (310), FeOOH (400), FeOOH (211), and FeOOH (002). On page 4700, “lower binding energies of ≈0.4 eV” should be revised as “higher binding energies of 1.2 eV”; “0.15 eV” should be revised as “0.17 eV”; “0.63 eV” should be revised as “0.95 eV”; and “0.19 eV” should be revised as “1.16 eV”. The data analysis and conclusions are not affected by these unintentional errors.