Changing methodology results in operational drift in the meaning of leaf area index, necessitating implementation of foliage layer index

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Leaf area index (LAI) was developed to describe the number of layers of foliage in a monoculture. Subsequent expansion into measurement by remote-sensing methods has resulted in misrepresentation of LAI. The new name foliage layer index (FLI) is applied to a more simply estimated version of Goodall's “cover repetition,” that is, the number of layers of foliage a single species has, either within a community or in monoculture. The relationship of FLI with cover is demonstrated in model communities, and some potential relationships between FLI and species’ habit are suggested. FLIcomm is a new formulation for the number of layers of foliage in a mixed-species’ community. LAI should now be reserved for remote-sensing applications in mixed communities, where it is probably a nonlinear measure of the density of light-absorbing pigments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rapson, G. L. (2018). Changing methodology results in operational drift in the meaning of leaf area index, necessitating implementation of foliage layer index. Ecology and Evolution, 8(1), 638–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3662

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free