Randomized trial of l -serine in patients with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1

101Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of l-serine in humans with hereditary sensory autonomic neuropathy type I (HSAN1).MethodsIn this randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with open-label extension, patients aged 18-70 years with symptomatic HSAN1 were randomized to l-serine (400 mg/kg/day) or placebo for 1 year. All participants received l-serine during the second year. The primary outcome measure was the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score version 2 (CMTNS). Secondary outcomes included plasma sphingolipid levels, epidermal nerve fiber density, electrophysiologic measurements, patient-reported measures, and adverse events.ResultsBetween August 2013 and April 2014, we enrolled and randomized 18 participants, 16 of whom completed the study. After 1 year, the l-serine group experienced improvement in CMTNS relative to the placebo group (-1.5 units, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.1, p = 0.03), with evidence of continued improvement in the second year of treatment (-0.77, 95% CI -1.67 to 0.13, p = 0.09). Concomitantly, deoxysphinganine levels dropped in l-serine-treated but not placebo-treated participants (59% decrease vs 11% increase; p < 0.001). There were no serious adverse effects related to l-serine.ConclusionHigh-dose oral l-serine supplementation appears safe in patients with HSAN1 and is potentially effective at slowing disease progression.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT01733407.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that high-dose oral l-serine supplementation significantly slows disease progression in patients with HSAN1.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fridman, V., Suriyanarayanan, S., Novak, P., David, W., Macklin, E. A., McKenna-Yasek, D., … Eichler, F. (2019). Randomized trial of l -serine in patients with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 1. Neurology, 92(4), E359–E370. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006811

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free