Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the performance of MOD16 and GLEAM evapotranspiration (ET) datasets in nine eddy covariance monitoring sites. Data from both ET products were downloaded and its daily means calculated. Evapotranspiration estimations were then compared to the observed ET in the eddy covariance monitoring sites from the Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in the Amazon (LBA). We performed a statistical analysis using the correlation coefficient (R), the root mean square error (RMSE) and BIAS. Results indicate that, in general, both products can represent the observed ET in the eddy covariance flux towers. MOD16 and GLEAM showed similar values to the calculated statistics when ET estimates were compared to observed ET. Model estimates and eddy covariance flux towers are subject to uncertainties that influence the analysis of remotely-sensed ET products.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Moreira, A. A., Adamatti, D. S., & Ruhoff, A. L. (2018). Avaliação dos produtos de evapotranspiração baseados em sensoriamento remoto MOD16 e GLEAM em sítios de fluxos turbulentos do Programa LBA. Ciência e Natura, 40, 112. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460x30714
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.