Avaliação dos produtos de evapotranspiração baseados em sensoriamento remoto MOD16 e GLEAM em sítios de fluxos turbulentos do Programa LBA

  • Moreira A
  • Adamatti D
  • Ruhoff A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the performance of MOD16 and GLEAM evapotranspiration (ET) datasets in nine eddy covariance monitoring sites. Data from both ET products were downloaded and its daily means calculated. Evapotranspiration estimations were then compared to the observed ET in the eddy covariance monitoring sites from the Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in the Amazon (LBA). We performed a statistical analysis using the correlation coefficient (R), the root mean square error (RMSE) and BIAS. Results indicate that, in general, both products can represent the observed ET in the eddy covariance flux towers. MOD16 and GLEAM showed similar values to the calculated statistics when ET estimates were compared to observed ET. Model estimates and eddy covariance flux towers are subject to uncertainties that influence the analysis of remotely-sensed ET products.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moreira, A. A., Adamatti, D. S., & Ruhoff, A. L. (2018). Avaliação dos produtos de evapotranspiração baseados em sensoriamento remoto MOD16 e GLEAM em sítios de fluxos turbulentos do Programa LBA. Ciência e Natura, 40, 112. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460x30714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free