Things are different elsewhere: An intellectual history of intellectual history in Sweden

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the 2010s, intellectual history has been experiencing growth and success internationally. There have been discussions about the identity and status of the field, often including taking recourse to its history. Such historiography focuses on the larger countries, which means leaving out one country where the historical study of ideas have been successfully institutionalized, namely Sweden. This article deals with the Swedish discipline idéhistoria, founded in 1932, and will introduce and situate the discipline within discussions of the international field of intellectual history, considering in what sense idéhistoria is a form of intellectual history. The findings are that if intellectual history is defined closely to the Cambridge School tradition, then idéhistoria is different, but if intellectual history is a field which more generally studies human thought, knowledge and ideas in their historical contexts, then idéhistoria is one nationally distinct but successful form of intellectual history. Having kept strong ties to the history of science, but also developing in other directions throughout its history, the discipline is today eclectic, held together more by institutional means than a strong kernel in methodology or practice. Still, for those advocating a broader intellectual history, idéhistoria may be seen as an interesting example.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jansson, A. (2021). Things are different elsewhere: An intellectual history of intellectual history in Sweden. Global Intellectual History, 6(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2019.1657634

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free