Meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for people with persistent pain; a reflexive thematic analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore the meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for participants living with persistent pain. Materials and methods: A phenomenological methodology was used. Thirteen purposefully selected participants, who self-identified as substantially improved from persistent pain due to rehabilitation, were interviewed in-depth. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analyses. Results: Participants included three men and ten women, age ranging from 22–69 years, pain duration was 2–30 years. Seven interconnected themes were developed: 1) indication of negative pain and health care experiences, 2) supporting working alliance with healthcare professionals, 3) Pain Dialogue, 4) improved self-awareness and self-regulation, 5) different view on pain, 6) autonomy and personal growth and 7) hope and new perspective. Integration of these themes provided a framework for understanding meaningful contributions of rehabilitation from the participants’ perspective. Conclusions: The study identified seven interconnected themes enhancing meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for participants who have substantially improved from persistent pain. These findings provide a novel conceptual understanding of how rehabilitation can foster recovery. The themes strongly support person-centred care, an understanding of Pain Dialogue and personal growth through the lens of the lived experience. The quality of the therapeutic relationship is considered a central vehicle for improved health outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beetsma, A. J., Paap, D., Pool, G., Reezigt, R. R., de Ruiter, E., Hobbelen, H. S. M., & Reneman, M. F. (2025). Meaningful contributions of rehabilitation for people with persistent pain; a reflexive thematic analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(5), 1276–1287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2367602

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free