QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: A cost-effectiveness analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The tuberculin skin test (TST) has limitations for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis in low-prevalence settings. Previously, all TST-positive individuals referred from the community to Baltimore City Health Department (BCHD) were offered LTBI treatment, after active TB was excluded. In 2010, BCHD introduced adjunctive QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) testing for TST-positive referrals. We evaluated costs and cost-effectiveness of this new diagnostic algorithm.Methods: A decision-analysis model compared the strategy of treating all TST-positive referrals versus only those with positive results on adjunctive QFT-GIT testing. Costs were collected at BCHD, and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were utilized to report on cost-effectiveness.Results: QFT-GIT testing at BCHD cost Gietz D.*St43.51 per test. Implementation of QFT-GIT testing was associated with an ICER of Gietz D.*St1,202 per quality-adjusted life-year gained and was considered highly cost-effective. In sensitivity analysis, the QFT-GIT strategy became cost-saving if QFT-GIT sensitivity increased above 92% or if less than 3.5% of individuals with LTBI progress to active TB disease.Conclusions: LTBI screening with TST in low-prevalence settings may lead to overtreatment and increased expenditures. In this public health clinic, additional QFT-GIT testing of individuals referred for a positive TST was cost-effective. © 2012 Shah et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, M., Miele, K., Choi, H., DiPietro, D., Martins-Evora, M., Marsiglia, V., & Dorman, S. (2012). QuantiFERON-TB gold in-tube implementation for latent tuberculosis diagnosis in a public health clinic: A cost-effectiveness analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-360

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free