Tomato Yield and Nitrogen Recovery as Influenced by Irrigation Method, Nitrogen Source, and Mulch

  • Sweeney D
  • Graetz D
  • Bottcher A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Factorial combinations of trickle or overhead irrigation, polyethylene mulch or no mulch, and 100% NH 4 NO 3 or 50% sulfur-coated urea (SCU) and 50% NH 4 NO 3 were evaluated for their effects on yield and N recovery by tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). In treatments using 100% NH 4 NO 3 , 15 N-depleted NH 4 NO 3 was applied. Neither tomato yield nor N uptake were affected by irrigation method but both were increased by the use of polyethylene mulch. Higher yields were obtained with NH 4 NO 3 than with 50% NH 4 NO 3 and 50% SCU. An average of 65% of the N in the plant and fruit originated from fertilizer N. Nitrogen recovery from plants and soil at the end of the season in treatments using 15 N-depleted fertilizer ranged from 52% to 95%. Highest recovery was obtained with mulch plus overhead irrigation. With this system, 53% of the added N was recovered by the plant and 42% remained in the soil. Only 5% of the added N was lost from the system. All of the other treatments resulted in loss of an average of 46% of the added N.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sweeney, D. W., Graetz, D. A., Bottcher, A. B., Locascio, S. J., & Campbell, K. L. (2022). Tomato Yield and Nitrogen Recovery as Influenced by Irrigation Method, Nitrogen Source, and Mulch. HortScience, 22(1), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.22.1.27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free