Efficacy of guselkumab versus secukinumab in subpopulations of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from the ECLIPSE study

25Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Guselkumab, an interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor, effectively treats moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Materials and methods: ECLIPSE, was a Phase 3, multicenter, 56-week, double-blinded, active-comparator study of guselkumab vs. secukinumab (IL-17A inhibitor) in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patients were treated with guselkumab 100 mg (n = 534) or secukinumab 300 mg (n = 514) through week 44. Efficacy (at least a 90% and 100% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI 90 and PASI 100], Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1, and IGA 0) was analyzed across subpopulations defined by baseline: age (<45, 45 to <65, and ≥65 years old), body weight, body mass index (BMI), psoriasis disease severity (body surface area, disease duration, PASI, and IGA), psoriasis by body regions (head, trunk, upper and lower extremities), and prior psoriasis medication history at week 48. Results: Overall, 1048 patients were randomized. At week 48, numerically greater proportions of patients achieved PASI 90, PASI 100, IGA 0/1, and IGA 0 with guselkumab vs. secukinumab regardless of baseline age, body weight, BMI, disease severity, body region, and prior medication. The largest differences were in patients ≥65 years old and patients weighing >100 kg. Conclusions: Guselkumab treatment provided greater efficacy vs. secukinumab at week 48 in most subpopulations of patients with psoriasis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blauvelt, A., Armstrong, A. W., Langley, R. G., Gebauer, K., Thaçi, D., Bagel, J., … Reich, K. (2022). Efficacy of guselkumab versus secukinumab in subpopulations of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results from the ECLIPSE study. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 33(4), 2317–2324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2021.1959504

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free