Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and indirect comparison of randomized trials

1Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Pembrolizumab (PEM) and tislelizumab (TIS), in combination with chemotherapy, have demonstrated significant clinical benefits in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no head-to-head clinical trial has yet compared these two treatments. Methods: We conducted a literature search of randomized trials, in which TIS plus chemotherapy or PEM plus chemotherapy were studied for the first-line treatment of NSCLC. Randomized design and the endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) were the inclusion criteria for our analysis. Adjusted indirect comparison between TIS and PEM was performed by application of the IPDfromKM-Shiny method. This method is based on the reconstruction of individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves. Outcomes in terms of PFS were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% and 90% confidence interval (CI). Results: Data were extracted from five randomized trials involving nearly 2,000 participants. In comparing PEM plus chemotherapy (n=748) or TIS plus chemotherapy (n=462) vs. chemotherapy alone (n=782), the Shiny method found a significant advantage in terms of PFS (HR =0.5856, 95% CI: 0.4986–0.6876 for TIS; HR =0.5573, 95% CI: 0.4969–0.6251 for PEM), thus confirming the results of the original trials. The indirect comparison of PEM plus chemotherapy vs. TIS plus chemotherapy showed a substantial equivalence between these two regimens (HR =0.952; 95% CI: 0.775–1.168; 90% CI: 0.801–1.130) suggesting an acceptable degree of equivalence according to regulatory criteria. Medians were 8.89 months for PEM combination, 7.97 months for TIS combination, and 5.69 for the controls. Conclusions: The PFS of TIS combined with chemotherapy was similar to that of PEM combined with chemotherapy. Based on the HR with 90% CI, these two agents met an equivalence criterion for PEM vs. TIS ranging from −19.9% to +13.0%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Messori, A., Rivano, M., Chiumente, M., & Mengato, D. (2023). Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and indirect comparison of randomized trials. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.21037/cco-23-26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free