Abstract
This paper examines determinants and consequences of the voting outcomes at uncontested director elections. As in prior studies, proxy advisors’ recommendations strongly predict shareholder votes. Based on novel hand-collected data from proxy advisors’ reports, we document the reasons behind negative recommendations and their association with shareholder votes. For example, board-level and committee-level issues trigger more negative votes than individual-level concerns. While high votes withheld rarely result in director turnover, firms often respond to shareholder dissatisfaction by addressing the underlying concern, with the rate of responsiveness increasing in voting dissent. Responsive and unresponsive firms do not differ in subsequent performance.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Oesch, D. (2014). Understanding Director Elections: Determinants and Consequences. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2447920
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.