Understanding Director Elections: Determinants and Consequences

  • Ertimur Y
  • Ferri F
  • Oesch D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines determinants and consequences of the voting outcomes at uncontested director elections. As in prior studies, proxy advisors’ recommendations strongly predict shareholder votes. Based on novel hand-collected data from proxy advisors’ reports, we document the reasons behind negative recommendations and their association with shareholder votes. For example, board-level and committee-level issues trigger more negative votes than individual-level concerns. While high votes withheld rarely result in director turnover, firms often respond to shareholder dissatisfaction by addressing the underlying concern, with the rate of responsiveness increasing in voting dissent. Responsive and unresponsive firms do not differ in subsequent performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., & Oesch, D. (2014). Understanding Director Elections: Determinants and Consequences. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2447920

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free