Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology

12Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study the ability of the Coulter MAXM analyzer to quantify reticulocytes was evaluated. The results were compared with those obtained by a microscopic method according to NCCLS H44-P recommendations and with the results from the automated analyzer Sysmex R-1000. Duplicate samples from 330 patients were analyzed. The reference intervals obtained with the three methods were: MAXM 0.37-1.80%, median 0.83%; manual 0.40-2.30%, median 1.00%; R-1000 0.60-1.95%, median 1.06%. The imprecision (CV) at all concentrations is lower than the microscopic method (low 16.1% vs 67%; normal 16.9% vs 28.9%; high 9.5% vs 13.0%). The MAXIM shows a good overall correlation with the microscopic method (intercept 0.01, slope 0.89, r2 = 0.87) despite evidence of a significant overestimation at low concentrations [difference (D) 0.301 and a moderate underestimation at normal (D -0.15) and high (D - 1.04) concentrations; the same behavior is shown in comparison with results from the R-1000, with an overall underestimation by MAXM (D -0.26). When compared with the microscopic method, MAXM shows a modest sensitivity at low reticulocyte counts (54.8%) and satisfactory sensitivity for high counts (87.3%), with an overall agreement of 81.3%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buttarello, M., Bulian, P., De Prà, M., Barbera, P., & Rizzotti, P. (1996). Reticulocyte quantification by Coulter MAXM VCS (volume, conductivity, light scatter) technology. Clinical Chemistry, 42(12), 1930–1937. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/42.12.1930

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free